Oh, indeedy, The Astonisher’s editor
accidently pricks his own pomposity with one of the best own goals of the year..
But it’s not just The Astonisher having
adventures in language - sources as
diverse as Clive James and an unnamed ABC reporter have been having their merry
way with words , too.
Larry Pickering explains Gina Rinehart’s
desire for seats on the board of Fairfax,
a mind-blowing property deal in the UK, and
Bentley continues his sporting theme when summing up the week in Townsville
City Council’s inner sanctum, all here in the nest at www.townsvillemagpie.com.au
Last Tuesday, North Queensland Newspapers
sacked almost all of their Townsville Bulletin sub-editors; those who stay on after the end of
August have been rebadged to do ‘higher duties’ but without extra pay or title.
As has been raised in this column before, the jobs only disappear out of the
Townsville community and economy – the paper will be sub-edited in Brisbane, as
predicted in last Saturdays Magpie - indeed predicted and vehemently denied 18 months ago.
Michael The Ogre of Ogden Street Wilkins returns to Sydney climes, his
position here made redundant. He has apparently rehabilitated himself from his
unnamed executive misdemeanor which saw his cheery, laughing presence here in
the first place.
But boy, if ever the time came when they
needed subs who are not so massively overworked that mistakes were inevitable,
it is now.
But editor Lachlan ‘Harry Potter’ Heywood
need not apply.
If his effort with the headline for his editorial on Friday is
anything to go by, he wouldn’t pass sub-editing 101. Mistakes in newspapers
make the average journo’s toes curl up in embarrassment, but when the error is
in a headline, there’s more shaking of heads than there is in the gents at half
time in a Crocs game.
And if the average journo’s toes curl up,
when the error is the editor’s own work, he may well just curl up in the fetal
position, sucking his thumb and hoping the world will go away.
Editor Heywood penned a prim little missive about MP Ewen
Jones’ selective use of statistics in a faux survey he conducted with taxpayers
money. It was chortle-worthy pot calling kettle effort – but have a look at the
headline he came up with:
This from the editor. Now just to help out
those folks reading this down at The Astonisher, the problem is with the word
‘looser’. A common error among the great unwashed and cranky old blogging
bastards, but three things make this occasion shamefully notable.
First of all, it is all editor’s own work. Although it is a sub editor’s job to
write headlines, more often than not those who honk on in editorials also think
up what they incorrectly fancy as snappy headers.
And of course, it was a headline, which makes it stick out like Dolly Parton’s
prominent parts on a cold day.
But the thing that The ‘Pie particularly noted - as did those who rang
him when they spotted the blooper - is the
scolding, hectoring nature of it. The Steggles Googy on Face Award is all
yours, ed.
If indeed, Harry, you had committed this
to the school paper at Hogwarts, Dumbledore would’ve sent you to the Whipping Tree and had you eating porcupine licorice
for a whole term.
So perhaps, as a mnemonic for the difference between ‘loose ‘and
‘lose’, the following might work:
Loose
Language Loses Credibility (and readers).
But if the subs have gone - and very soon,
there will be only half a dozen reporters left in what will essentially be a
bureau editorially – it is interesting to note that one person has retained her
position. Jenny Hill remains an associate editor, judging by the Astonisher’s
special brand of drivel during the week.
Mayor Mullet was well and truly smacked down
on Tuesday, when she tried to whiteant the CEO Ray Burton, not a bloke to take on the mantle of victim.
After some very pointed and insulting comments insinuating that Mr Burton had deliberately
mislead the council on the matter of the deficit – and a pompous but pointless
verbal fingerwag from The Mullet’s loyal
brown-noser Les Messagebank Walker – the mayor moved that the CEO position be
put up for grabs after Mr Burton’s performance had been evaluated.
The latest episode in Mayor Mullet's Unreality Show. |
Talk about leading with your chin – Mayor Mullet
was spanked, the motion tanking eight votes to three.
She would later bemoan her fate, whingeing
that she was disappointed that ‘the opposition’ had voted in a bloc. Listen,
Mullet me old dear, you can’t have it both ways – if, as you insist, they are
‘opposition’, how else do you expect them to vote? You’d know all about that
from those heady Mooney years, wouldn’t you? But if this group of indepedents
voted as they saw fit individually, get over yourself and get on with things.
Then, flexing her editorial muscle with The
Astonisher a day or so later, she praised Cairns Council for having the ‘courage’
to sack their CEO, clearly suggesting that those who didn’t agree with her
spiteful brand of bullying were cowards. The relevance of this opinion is unfathomable
except to confirm that Lachlan Heywood feels about her in much the same way that Harry
Potter feels about Hermione.
Just while we’re in the neck of the woods, after
Tuesday’s vote, an idle thought popped up - whether the reverse was possible – could the council raise a
vote of no confidence in the mayor herself? The Magpie hears that that was fleetingly canvassed around Walker Street.
The answer is no but apparently only in
Queensland. Such a move is quite correctly not allowed here because the mayor is
elected by the voters. In other states, mayors are selected by those elected to
council, who choose one from among their number, and the mayor can be ‘demoted’ back to councillor through a no confidence motion, thus avoiding any costly rerun.
So how lucky is Jenny, a transplanted
Victorian, that she’s a mayor in Queensland. Otherwise, she would never gained
the position in the first place.
And another bit of info for nervous nellies
out there. A council can only be sacked and an administrator installed if the
council cannot reach decisions on issues, or is a financial disaster. The Act
makes no mention of a mayor and his/her situation. So an administrator is
unlikely in Townsville, because the council can make decisions, and is on a
very sound financial road – thanks to the likes of Ray Burton.
So Mayor Mullet’s foot-stamping and
narcissistic blather denying the reality of her position is all for naught. So
once again, Mullet, heed the people; get over it and get on with it.
Fat chance, opines The ‘Pie.
Speaking of fat chance, here’s Pickering’s
succinct reason why Gina Rinehart is insisting on her own three seats on the
Fairfax board.
A couple of other notes on language during
the week.
The ailing but still very-much-with-us
Clive James, pissed off that people had
just about had him carked already, suggested he would be around for a while
longer, so he’d appreciate if people would ‘stop getting the hearse before the
horse’. Neat.
And the Mangled Metaphor of the Week goes
to the Victorian ABC reporter talking about the new anti-corruption commission
losing some of its powers, concluding that the government wanted to ‘muzzle the
Commission and remove its teeth’. Geez,
isn’t dentistry tricky enough already? And a friend t’other day, discussing a
mutual mate, said ‘he’s not always consistent’.
Huh? Think about it.
Finally, if you think things are a bit out
of hand in Australia with property prices, try this from the UK: a beach hut, barely six square metres, was snapped up immediately
when it came on the market, selling for more than $A250,000. No running water,
virtually no other amenities hooked up to municipal grids, rates of nearly
$4000 a year – and you can only stay overnight in the summer months! Bargain,
eh? Read about it here.
Enough, it is away to Poseurs’ Bar, where
the old bird will seek out Mongrel the Barrister to repeat the toast he made at
a function during the week – it goes something along these lines:
Here’s to the girls in their little red
shoes,
They love their men and they love their
booze,
They’ll lose their virtue but that’s no
sin,
Loose gals will still have the box the cherries came in.
Talk about faux surveys! The Bulletin should include its own annual drivel seeking information so called "survey" - the results of which become trickled out "news stories" over the slow news summer months
ReplyDeleteSome editorial - in the very first par we get 'Politicians that ....'
ReplyDeleteGeez, Harry, it really is magic that you're an editor. Surely Hogwarts had better standards than that.
First rule for rising up the ranks in News Ltd:
ReplyDeleteMust be a lightweight twit with no scruples
Second rule:
Must be skillful with a knife
As always, informative.
DeleteHey 'Pie...I betcha you will see a lot more posts by disaffected former employees of the Bull-Tin. "lightweight twit" hahahahaha
ReplyDeleteThe bias of this newspaper towards the ALP is becoming an absolute joke. A totally offensive one. Even Tony Red Ragit has shed all restraints.
Perhaps someone should give the old fella' a call...
Child journalists will never get promoted to sub editors in the town of Townsville.
ReplyDeleteFYI, most of the Astonisher's videos are contributed or made by the astonisher's graphic design department and not by media types like they used to. They seem to think that producing political media punch up games constitutes news.
"Any politician (singular) that fails to consult with (Americanism, like "meet with") their (plural) constituents is (singular) doomed to a very a (extraneous a) short time in office..." Good grief! What a pity editors who fail to give their own 'loose' prose a second glance before publishing are left sitting in the Bully bunker.
ReplyDeleteWhat's wrong with "Politicians who fail to consult their constituents are doomed to a very short time in office"?
It still isn't true, but at least it makes sense.
A couple of bully media shooters were really good at producing videos. They had a pro cameraman in their stables and he worked at a tv station. He was blocked by Hun to head up this department and Hun favoured the graphic designer's media techniques instead. One new video a month?
ReplyDeleteDo any of your X bully editorial staff recall how the rosters would go down to three days? Our manager would not go any futher ensuring that we had no life outside of work.
DeleteYa gotta love Bentley. Knockout !
ReplyDeleteLarry Pickering is so unkind. Still laughed out loud though.
ReplyDelete“News Ltd CEO Kim Williams … deliberately didn’t say who or when” ~ Magpie, June 23
ReplyDeleteThis mess-you-about format applies equally to the present turmoil in the Asbestos Bunker. The guts of Harry Potter’s latest mystifying spell is: “We are not offering voluntary redundancy, we’re going to need some of you in Brisbane. And we reserve the right to retain you in Townsville if we want you. Of course we won’t mess you about; we’ll have a decision in two weeks and those who leave us will be paid out according to the Award.”
Anyone remember a year or so back when sub-editors were told no one was leaving, it was cheaper for News Ltd to keep them here?
This leaves the remaining subs, up to and including Simon Price, not knowing whether they’re staying or going.
The word to those who expect to be ejected is: find out from the MEAA exactly what you’re entitled to. At least one editorial staff member had to call in the union to get what she was owed, and they’re certainly not above trying that again.